Talk:Personal Genome Project

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Nature versus nurture#Interaction of genes and environment|environment]] The anchor (#Interaction of genes and environment) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Some info about the project from my personal experience:[edit]

The test is quite considerable (like a genetics 101 seminar). I spoke to a doctor about it who was concerned that it would introduce an enormous Selection_bias. IMO: This will end up being a comprehensive study of college educated middle-to-upper class Americans. Which, if profit is a concern, is just the demographic that pharmaceutical company would want to research.

The study guide can be found at pgpstudy.org... it's a really fun read. I highly recommend it to anyone who's interested in genetics.

The study guide points out that some preference will be given to volunteers with genetic relatives enrolled in the study. Accordingly, this has had a bit of a "viral" effect on services like Facebook and Geni where relatives are busy trying to get their cousins to sign up too. 71.111.198.84 (talk) 20:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Personal Genome Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]