Talk:Peter McLellan

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Victoria / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Peter McLellan is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

I did not make any speculation[edit]

Frickeg has misrepresented me when I said that it is unknown whether Frankston East voters had voted the same way in the supplementary election than the way they voted in the general election.

Speculation is about guessing one outcome or another. I made no such speculation as how Frankston East voters voted on the general election day because I have stated the votes were destroyed upon learning of McLellan's death before proceeding to the supplementary election. Hence why the outcome of the vote from the general election is unknown.

An unknown result is not speculation is just mere fact. 58.109.94.172 (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is unsourced, though. You need to provide a source saying that the votes were destroyed following McLellan's death. I would say that saying that the outcome of the votes is unknown is a natural consequence of them being, you know, destroyed before being counted. I still want the last sentence of the final paragraph removed, because I think it is unnecessary and, yes, close to speculation. Frickeg (talk) 23:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]