Talk:Peter Toh
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Neutrality tag[edit]
Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written from a neutral point of view. Sentences and phrases like, "Peter eloquently articulates words and sounds that represent the world we live in" and "Peter Toh is the musician that will take control of the music industry" are not neutral. I have removed some of them, but left the first phrase and some others because I don't want to decimate the article. If someone can re-write it, it'd be good. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Anthony Rupert 02:18, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Significance?[edit]
This guy's only significance seems to be with his old band. He's got one self-made EP he's now trying to promote.. so what? This would qualify as a speedy in it's current condition, but before deleting it maybe it should just be a redirect to The Stryder. I see no indication that this guy meets WP:MUSIC guidelines (or comes remotely close) by himself. Friday (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)