Talk:Peugeot 604

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Kia Version?

Should anything be added about Kia producing a version of the 604 under license beginning in 1979? The Korean model was identical save for round twin headlamps.

70.51.84.99 22:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2.5 Turbo Diesel

According to this doc http://documents.surplusuk.com/131528B.PDF there was a 2.5 turbo diesel as well. Here's what it says

PEUGE 604 2.3 TD 09.79 - 05.83 59 80 2304 Saloon

PEUGE 604 2.5 TD 08.83 - 12.86 66 90 2498 Saloon

Is it true?

Intended competitors[edit]

Can anyone verify that this car was originally intended to compete with the more established makes and models? I have already got a reliable source for the 604's more direct competitors. Kevjgav (talk) 14:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the "In the marketplace" section already covers this.

If you have sources though, then please share here or add them in the appropriate sections of the article.

Thanks Jenova20 16:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No quality scale rating?[edit]

This article has got a lot of well sourced information and even though I've got no account, I'm surprised it hasn't been rated a good article/featured article. But then I'm not a Wikipedian, so I don't know what the criteria is for that.--50.190.103.126 (talk) 14:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too many sources?[edit]

This could have been a good article, but with 77 sources, I don't see how that's possible. I'd say that many sources would be WP:OVERCITE. If someone could condense these sources, so that the OVERCITE tag can be removed, that would be helpful.--73.172.36.126 (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]