Talk:Phantasms (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Most hilarious scene ever?[edit]

I personally think this episode contains one of the most hilarious scenes in TNG: Data tells Worf to take care of his cat. Worf's reaction to the cat and to Data's cat feeding and treatment advise just crack me up in ways that should not be healthy. Maybe it's cat-person humour, but I just thought this deserves a mention here, though it probably does not belong in the article. — Ashmodai ^{(talk · contribs)} 21:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unquestionably cat-person humor. Especially since I once asked my boyfriend (who is built rather like Worf) to watch my cat and he had a similar reaction. SkepticalGal 20:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Short Scenes and Quotes[edit]

I recommend 'Short Scenes' be treated like 'Trivia' and the Quotes section moved to Wikiquotes. Somehow. I checked Wikiquotes, TNG, it's all sorts of weird.

Lots42 09:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The quotes section does not belong here - I am removing. -- Beardo 17:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

move Phantasms -> Phantasms (Star Trek: The Next Generation)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

to allow Phantasms to be redirected to Phantasm, where multiple phantasm possibilities are listed, as it is unlikely the Star Trek episode is the desired topic. 70.55.90.138 07:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Better that way. -- Beardo 17:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree, especially with so many more other prominent 'Phantasm' topics -- Lots42 03:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per nominator's sound argument. --DeLarge 12:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. --Polaron | Talk 20:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed from Phantasms to Phantasms (Star Trek: The Next Generation) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated/Copied Content?[edit]

Apologies if I've just overlooked an attribution or "used by permission" statement but the bulk of this entry (as of Friday, September 29, 2007, 12:45am) is identical to that shown at http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Phantasms (which is listed as an "external link" in this Wikipedia article). Is this kind of thing acceptable, or is this a violation of a copyright (either a Wikipedia editor has copied this material, or Memory Alpha has copied it from Wikipedia)

-- Willfe 04:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know many websites copy -from- Wikipedia with Wiki-permission. But that's all I know. Lots42 11:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]