Talk:Phantom Manor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article needs a thorough rewrite[edit]

Encyclopaedia articles cannot read like the insider's dialogue on a fan forum. It's a fascinating article, but it needs to sound less flowery and should not involve vague Disney terms.

Also, it cannot be written in a "we"-perspective. But most of all it needs more facts! Actual facts, not the facts the Imagineers want us to perceive as facts as we experience the ride. Tomsintown 23:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agreed. And there are more than one version of the history of the ride (in terms of the plot of what is supposed to have happened to the fictious characters years ago). I am not sure also why the ride is, for the benefit of the article, split into three parts; also facts re capacity of ride and number of doom buggies etc would be of interest TimothyJacobson (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source?[edit]

This reads like a Babelfished copyvio. -- Cyrius| 16:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday[edit]

Has the attraction been turned into a "Nightmare Before Christmas" attraction (like Haunted Mansion Holiday in California)? If so, is it worth writing an article on this? TimothyJacobson (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the 'Phantom Manor holiday' decoration for 2010 a fact? There are no references cited and I could not find anything on the web about that. Could the editor please state where he/she found that information? Pascualangulo (talk) 06:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Facade[edit]

Whereas , I can see where the casual viewer , would mistake the outside as an homage to the Bates home in "Psycho" , it's not what the Imagineers used as a model. According to the book , "The Haunted Mansion:From The Magic Kingdom To The Movies" , it is largely based on the Fourth Ward School in Virginia City,Nevada. ( The schoolhouse standing one story taller. ). 75.104.190.248 (talk) 01:03, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phantom Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of too much content[edit]

Aside from the obvious lacking of citations/references, the article seems WP:BLOATED and filled with excess information. Most of the article is written very well, but it seems that lots of information is WP:UNSOURCED and unnecessary. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:53, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General QOL improvements[edit]

Hey all- I went through and removed some flowery language, fixed some errors, and added some information. Generally just QOL improvements, as well as cutting down the page in some areas that were unnecessarily lengthy or wordy. Added a few citations here and there, etc. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerrGause (talkcontribs) 05:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]