Talk:Pholiota nubigena
Pholiota nubigena has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 9, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Pholiota nubigena appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Nivatogastrium nubigenum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 16:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Great pictures; what a weird species.
- "The genus Nivatogastrium was circumscribed by American mycologists Rolf Singer and Alexander H. Smith in 1959, who set N. nubigenum as the type and only species." Perhaps worth mentioning that there are now other species?
- "Pseudoparaphyses (long hair-like cells that grow down from the roof of locules, and often end up connecting the roof and the floor of the locule) are abundant in the gleba; they measure about 16 by 12.5 µm" It strikes me odd that something almost as thick as it is long would be described as "hair-like"; are they perhaps hair-like when linked together (so, rather than "hair-like cells", they are "cells producing a hair like structure")?
- I assume you know what you're doing, but is California Fungi definitely a solid source?
- You don't provide a publishing location for the Laws book.
- There are some nice tidbits about the fungus here.
Great work, as usual. J Milburn (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)