Talk:Piano Concerto No. 21 (Mozart)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Copyright[edit]

This article was copied word for word from http://w3.rz-berlin.mpg.de/cmp/mozart_piano_con21.html without attribution. The original page indicates the text is copyrighted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.168.223 (talk) 07:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion of this article[edit]

Egemont and I are currently expanding this article under User:Pianoplonkers/Sandbox 3 and will upload it as soon as we have finished doing this. Thanks--Pianoplonkers (talk) 16:45, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Pianoplonkers (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=42:73872~T1. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Voceditenore (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible other copyright problems[edit]

I also have a strong suspicion that virtually the entire Structure section (added in a single edit in 2006 [1]) may also have been copied from somewhere, possibly a book. Note that all sites on the internet currently displaying the text have copied from Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 19:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Song Sung Blue[edit]

Not a mention?! At this point I think far more people know this song than some obscure Swedish movie.

I'm going to add it in. Someone else source it, please -- kinda beyond me! 209.172.25.74 (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, the movie was quite noticed, won some major international awards and did well at the box office - in short, it was anything but "obscure" in its day. Few movie nicknames of that kind survive a long time - for instance, recordings of Gustav Mahler's 5th Symphony are not billed as "the theme from Death in Venice" these days, though they sometimes were in the 1970s when the impact of the film was fresh. 83.254.151.33 (talk) 15:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 21st Piano Concerto and Vivaldi's Spring[edit]

How is nobody talking about the fact that several violin sections of Mozart's 21st Piano Concerto are practically taken straight out of Vivaldi's La Primavera, composed some 60 years earlier? The parts are too many and too similar to be a coincidence. You might even say that Vivaldi runs through almost the entire concerto, to some extent. Just listen to them! 90.224.226.244 (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard this one before. Do you have a side-by-side comparison? Or two videos with pairs of time-markers? Both pieces use relatively simple melodies -- are these more complex than simple scales or arpeggios? DavidRF (talk) 16:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Cultural references" needs some care[edit]

The second movement is referred to in inconsistent ways. And the second movement's references are listed before the first movement's, which seems counter-intuitive. Be good to just make that section a bit more professional. 2601:600:A480:D8E0:95AB:7F1E:F2A7:46BA (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's referred to as the "second movement" and "andante movement" alternatively to avoid repetition. The 2nd movement is mentioned first because it's the most well-known part. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]