Talk:Piano Concerto No. 2 (Chopin)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creation date[edit]

This article states the work was composed in 1830, while Frédéric Chopin states In Warsaw in December 1829 he performed the premiere of his Piano Concerto in F minor at the Merchants' Club. Which one is right? --Rebel2 16:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He may have played it privately in 1829. —  $PЯINGrαgђ  03:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs objectivity[edit]

Why is the author of this article writing like a music critic and not a music historian? This article is distastefully (and embarrassingly) subjective in its analysis. Furthermore, the article is downright flowery. Content over style, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.157.51 (talk) 04:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

I think the main problem with this article at the moment is possible original research. It reads more like someone's essay and has two references--one of which is dead. I'm busy with Chopin at the moment but I will do this if I can. I'm stringing together a list of possible refs for improvement; feel free to add any you can find. I will add more bit by bit. RainCity471 09:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Chopin: The Piano Concertos at Google Books by John Rink, ISBN 9780521446600
  • A Handbook to Chopin's Works, p. 68, at Google Books by Ashton Johnston, p. 68, ISBN 9783867414371

Analysis[edit]

That Chopin was unskilled at writing in Classical sonata form is purely opinion -- an opinion that many scholars and musicians certainly do not hold. There is plenty of classic sonata-form technique displayed in this concerto. Lauretano (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Piano Concerto No. 2 (Chopin). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Methods in Music for Performers[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 January 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RoninDC (article contribs).

CNKI Source[edit]

@User:Intforce you removed mine CNKI source, but I think it is useful for this article. The source link was a download link for that essay, it does not have pdfs available online, but after you downloaded it, on page 6, it outlines the whole structure. On page 2, "Chopin 'F minor concerto no.2 ' was actually the first concerto he had written, but because of publishing issue, it became the second concerto. In 1829, Chopin have his first relationship, he met a classmate... Afterward, Chopin uses music to express the love." Can you further explain why this source is questionable? it is a scholar essay with peer review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QiuLiming1 (talkcontribs) 22:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While citing non-English sources is allowed, they are hard for other editors to verify, see WP:NONENG. I'm not sure why you would cite a Chinese source given that the subject plenty of reliable sources in English exist. The Chinese article for sure is citing some Polish / English source itself, so why don't you add that? intforce (talk) 10:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK. It is because I could not find free google sources on google scholar. QiuLiming1 (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]