Talk:Piledriver (microarchitecture)

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

prod[edit]

I just created this. it needed to be separated off. all of AMDs articles are terribly messy, and pile-driver, at least, is deserving of its own article, no different than sandy bridge or ivy bridge Aunva6 (talk) 14:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

add windows 7 core parking patch information[edit]

i have added the core parking info as it is still relevant to AMD piledriver and later AMD modular cpus Leexgx (talk) 05:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lost control :-/[edit]

Could someone please revert to the version from Mikhail Ryazanov 01:28, 30 September 2014‎ ? I completely lost control over the "rowspan" stuff :-( I'm very sorry and will try to do better next time without messing up something -- 194.8.209.244 (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 May 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move, no case to answer at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Piledriver (microarchitecture) → AMD Piledriver – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Tholme (talk) 10:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose since no rationale is given. Dicklyon (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.