This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Aside from the obvious lack of any citations, and the ridiculous POV stuff which I've attempted to tone down, is the title even used anywhere outside of this page? Moreover, does this really merit its own page? MacCormick v. Lord Advocate is discussed elsewhere and is not directly related. Effectively the story here is of some vandals attacking post boxes... --Breadandcheese (talk) 18:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I've just stumbled across this article and think it should be deleted. The mention of pillar boxes being vandalised due to opposition to the Queen's title could easily appear in a more appropriate article (for example, one discussing the numbering convention). Hoe do you propose for deletion? Fishiehelper2 (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]