Talk:Pol Sangi

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Iran may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

On 2 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Stone Bridge (Tabriz). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 2 August 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. per discussion consensus and naming policies. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 21:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pol Sangi → Stone Bridge (Tabriz) – Please rename this article to "Stone Bridge (Tabriz)". See similar examples "here".Trkgs (talk) 10:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Jack Frost (talk) 10:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment converted to formal RM. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No evidence that it is called "Stone Bridge" in English-langauge sources. Note that Sangi Bridge is an apparent duplicate of this article and has been redirected here. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:28, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please add image http://www.persiantourismguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/images1.jpg - more use than changing the title In ictu oculi (talk) 07:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What license is that under? it has no sourcing. Secretlondon (talk) 12:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Stone Bridge is very non-specific, and English generally doesn't translate foreign name of places. I don't know what the normal name is in English, but I doubt it's translated. Secretlondon (talk) 12:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm seeing usage of "Stone Bridge" in at least some reliable, academic sources, whereas I'm struggling to find any using the current title. We should be reflecting the most common use, to the extent that exists, in English language sources (which can sometimes be the translated title, and sometimes the original).--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There are plenty of online references to both names, although nothing substantial. Given that's the case, I think it's better to keep it in the original language without need for disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Iran has been notified of this discussion. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.