Talk:Pole Vault (communications system)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 07:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pole Vault antenna
Pole Vault antenna
  • ... that the first troposcatter communications system, Pole Vault (antenna pictured), linked Pinetree Line radars along 2,250 km (1,400 mi) of wilderness in Labrador? Source: "first" is stated in Lester page 33 and in the introduction xv. Also mentioned in Electronics World. The length is a simple conversion of the 1,400 miles length stated in several source, the second is Lester page 36.

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 14:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting system, covered in detail on few but good sources, no copyvio obvious. I prefer the original hook, "wilderness" being more attractive than "USAF". You will have to find a way to say (pictured) in a hook if the pic is wanted. It's licensed and a good illustration. In the article, I am surprised by European date formats, and that the article name appears only in the beginning and towards the end. A source calls it "code name" - should that be clarified? "The system was first proposed in 1952 as a system ..." (in the lead) reads a bit repetitive. The header "Troposcatter takes over" seems a bit inconsistent with the others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, forgot the "pictured" bit, fixed. Removing alt, I agree. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for all the adjustments! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]