Talk:Policy laundering

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Facts on examples[edit]

I added the {{fact}} to the examples of policy laundering. I had this discussion a few months on Talk:WTO but unless there's an article that specifically says WTO treaties are a form of policy laundering, we can't say it. --Patrick (talk) 13:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. Added a quote from vice president of European Union with regards to Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) being policy laundering. AnimeJanai (talk) 10:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other sources[edit]

I believe Sabino Cassese is one of the most respected international scholars on these topics. See for instance his 2010 book: «State sovereignty is becoming diluted. Public power is being rearticulated in pluralistic and polycentric forms. National legal orders must confront problems that are beyond their capacity to resolve alone. And onto these legal orders are superimposed a number of others, on many different levels.» Nemo 15:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]