Talk:Polish cochineal/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA Sweeps: On hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that needs to be addressed.

1. The first paragraph in the "Life cycle" section is unsourced. If the information is taken from the source in the second paragraph then add it to the end of this one as well. I was going to verify it myself, but it's in a Polish.
2. The first paragraph in the "Trade" section also needs citations.
3. There's two dabs that should be fixed.

Hopefully it shouldn't be too difficult to add the sources for these areas of the article. This article covers the topic well and has several great free images. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at WP:GAN. I'll contact all of the main contributors and related WikiProjects so the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you extend the period until the end of July, please? I have no time for Wikipedia during this week. Thanks. — Kpalion^(talk) 09:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I managed to find some time and do all the corrections suggested above. It wasn't that much work after all. Thanks for reviewing the article, Nehrams2020. — Kpalion^(talk) 15:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps: Kept

Good work addressing the issues. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the online sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)