Talk:Political Martyrs' Monument

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Edinburgh High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Happypirate21.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List[edit]

The list order was changed a while ago, with the edit summary
"put thomas muir to top. he was the most important of the five"
I’ve changed it back to the way it was; I can’t remember now what the rationale was for the list, whether it was alpahabetical (in which case theres a mistake in it) or if it reflects the order on the monument itself.
But either of those would be better rationales for the order here than a subjective opinion on who was the most important.
Thoughts? Swanny18 (talk) 19:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has the order as seen on the monument, so it seemed best to go with that...Swanny18 (talk) 22:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Scottish Martyrs to Liberty"[edit]

This expression appears to be a Wiki neologism, which is advised against by the WP:NOTNEO guidelines. I am removing it until some decent sources can be found for this. --Breadandcheese (talk) 15:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]