Talk:Ponte Sant'Angelo

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Vandalism[edit]

Wait a minute... The pilgrims sucked cocks? Who wrote that? Can somebody please change that? Greetings, Wouter from Holland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.123.178.18 (talk) 18:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pearsob (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)== Number of arches? ==[reply]

The article claims there are three arches to the bridge, but the image in the article displays at least five... What is the explanation for this? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bridge's three central arches are still the originals from the ancient Roman era. In the seventeenth century two more arches were added, one on either side, to replace the original ramps that lead to the bridge. ^[1] Pearsob (talk) 20:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.aviewoncities.com/rome/pontesantangelo.htm

Pons Aelius, meaning the Bridge of Hadrian,[edit]

"Pons Aelius, meaning the Bridge of Hadrian"... I don't think so... Pons Aelius translates as the Bridge of Aeolius, or Aeolian Bridge, surely? Elio1 (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In 1535, Pope Clement VII allocated the toll income... Pope Clement VII died in 1534. Narvalo (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ponte Sant'Angelo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224170408/http://www.beliefnet.com/features/bridgeofangels/index.html to http://www.beliefnet.com/features/bridgeofangels/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Angel on bridge of angels in Rome.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photographic Accuracy?[edit]

The photo currently displayed on this article (Sant'Angelo bridge, dusk, Rome, Italy.jpg), while extremely beautiful, also seems to be more artistic than accurate when compared to street views on Google maps. The large domed building featured prominently in the picture (Saint Peter's Basilica) has been photoshopped in, as it is not actually located so close to this bridge. Other background buildings, as well as the horizon line, have all been photoshopped to appear closer than they really are. There may be other inaccuracies, but these are the most offensive. I do not myself have a better picture to replace it with, so I hope someone else does. I viewed this google maps view in order to arrive at this conclusion: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9016456,12.4664612,3a,75y,273.24h,75.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sVUGN219SYKkqw98kKZiZTg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DVUGN219SYKkqw98kKZiZTg%26cb_client%3Dsearch.gws-prod.gps%26w%3D211%26h%3D120%26yaw%3D141.8043%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu. Mistsong10 (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with photoshop, the effect is just obtained with a telephoto lens. Alex2006 (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.aviewoncities.com/rome/pontesantangelo.htm

[1]