Talk:Portland Institute for Contemporary Art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

  • Support merge as nom. Both articles are very short and the festival would probably not pass WP:NOTE on its own. Katr67 (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose
  1. I oppose the merge as nominated. I split off and created the article on the Time-Based Art Festival because it is notable enough on its own to have such an article in Wikipedia (contrary to claim above). It is a stub and needs other editors to develop it. I don't have time to do so. For comment, please see also: Talk:Time-Based Art Festival. --NYScholar (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Comment I am using nom here as shorthand for "nominator". I'm supporting the merge as the nominator. Please don't change people's posts on talk pages. See WP:TALK. And these don't usually get long enough to require separate sections. Katr67 (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]