Talk:Portland Monthly/Archive 1

Importance rating?

I think the highest this is "Mid". Why top? Katr67 (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I grabbed the project templates from Talk:The Oregonian. Fixed it. Cirt (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Cool, thanks. Nice work starting this! Katr67 (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. That's a handy-dandy list over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon/redlinks List. :) -- Cirt (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review

This article has had a GA review, and was successfully promoted to WP:GA-quality. The GA subpage for the archived review is here. Cirt (talk) 09:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Discuss recent edits here

I think the recent edits were done in good faith and weren't vandalism. The editor who was reverted provided a link to a citation on his/her talk page, which was later deleted for some reason. If that was added here, and hopefully someone can help with the citation format because it's not easy for new editors to figure out, that should be sufficient. I imagine there is a bit of a learning curve around here in terms of "What part of 'I work there, I should know' don't you understand?!" Let's all be mindful of article ownership issues as well. Thanks. Katr67 (talk) 20:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Let's all be mindful of conflict of interest issues as well. And WP:RS. And WP:V. And the fact that we should not permit removal of sourced material in favor of wholly unsourced changes by a WP:SPA WP:COI account. Thanks. Cirt (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Let's not all be remarkably unable to do a quick Google search. Maybe something can be found here. Katr67 (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Pending find a secondary source that satisfies WP:RS and WP:V, I have updated the editor info, citing the official website's "About us" page. Cirt (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Update

This page is currently being updated by the staff of Portland Monthly magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdenies (talk • contribs) 18:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

In which case @Rdenies:, you need to read about conflict of interest immediately. Valfontis (talk) 20:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Removed the Conflict of interest editing

I've removed the conflict of interest editing.

Please post here to the talk page with suggestions if you have a WP:COI, and don't edit the article directly.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 10:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Secondary sources

This article in its WP:GA quality state relies upon secondary sources, and NOT primary sources.

Please let's keep it to secondary sources that are independent of the article's subject itself.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 10:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)