Talk:Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePowers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starPowers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions is part of the Millennium (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 30, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 27, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Millennium's "Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions" makes reference to Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions?
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Powers, Principalities, Thrones and Dominions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 04:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Plot: "Watts contacts Black for help with the case. However, Black is still recovering from the murder of his friend Bob Bletcher" Is this in the present, or are we still in flashback mode?
    Everything after Pepper being zapped at the start is a flashback leading up to that scene being repeated from a different POV at the end; I've clarified that a little in the plot now. GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot: "...as evidence disappears or witnesses fail to identify him in a line-up..." I would change 'or' to 'and'
    Done. GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: "...as well as directing..." -> "...as well as direct..."
    Done. GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reception: Maybe its just me, but although the DVD Talk review is sort of mixed, all the rest seem to be positive, so I'd change "mixed to positive" to "moderately positive" or something of the like
    Done, as "mostly positive". GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • References: Ref 14 has the wrong title attached to it
  • References: Ref 15 has the wrong title attached to it
    Wow, that was sloppy of me. Got both of those. GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the only issues (aside from the fact that I love the Oxford Comma and this title doesn't have one, but I digress) that I could find. On hold.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yeah, I'm usually a serial comma man myself despite it being rare in Europe. Not sure why. Thanks again for another good review! GRAPPLE X 02:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem. Everything looks good; I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]