Talk:Presumed security
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Article review[edit]
Feels a bit unencyclopedic to have this level of discussion of the sole source used for this article:
The phrase "presumed security" appears to have been first coined by the security commentary website Zero Flaws.[1] The article uses the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst as an example, focusing on the apparent lack of entry security and contrasting it against the presumed security a military installation will have. The article also details the flaws inherent in a trust seal such as the Verisign Secure Site seal, and explains why this presumed security approach is actually detrimental to an overall security posture.
What do others think? - Here Under The Oaks (talk) 18:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, User :Here Under The Oaks. This page should be fused with a similar page, small section- has no standalone power at all.Wuerzele (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I may take a crack at this merger/fusion process. Will be a good training experience for me. - Here Under The Oaks (talk) 16:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)