Talk:Prhizzm

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete, 9 May 2006, see discussion.
Undelete and Relist, 25 May 2006, see discussion.
No Consensus, 31 May 2006, see discussion.
Keep, 26 March 2007, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Canada: Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Electronic music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

'Minerals' is an album, not an EP[edit]

The Minerals release constitutes a full album, not an EP, given that it is 12 tracks long and has a total run-time of 41 minutes. Also, all the rhetoric on the benbecula site advertises this release as "a full length album of oddities". See: http://www.benbecula.com/release/various/minerals_series.shtml

I gather this fact may have helped assuage certain concerns during the recent deletion debate. Out of hypersensitivity to maintaining a NPOV, I hesitate to make the change myself. I'll let the facts speak for themselves, and some kind soul speak for me. :) BFD1 20:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post-script: to be fair, the article as it stands right now is misleading in that it suggests that the "first full-length" will be released in 2007. I submit that that line should be changed to read, "first full-length of new material" or something along those lines, if not removed entirely. Admittedly, I originally added it to the article in haste without fully considering the consequences. BFD1 20:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed and fixed. Thanks for the info. OZLAWYER talk 12:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Hood Controversy[edit]

I really don't see what the John Hood controversy is doing on this page. The edits by User:BFD1 are an improvement, but I see no reason not to revert it straight back to the version of 2nd May 2007. Jonathan A Jones 13:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, there isn't even any commentary on the edits in the student newspaper article (such as whether they are "good" or not). He's edited plenty of other articles too. Seems useless information. I've removed it. Lexicon (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:PrhizzmEPcover.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:PrhizzmEPcover.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 14 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:PrhizzmEPcover.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]