Talk:PrimaLoft

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Alternative to?[edit]

It's not likely, despite the quoted source, that the Army was looking, in the 1980s, for an alternative to feathers, but rather to other synthetic fibers, which somehow were not adequate. Would be much more interesting to say why the artificial fibers were inadequate.24.6.66.149 (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"similar dry performance"[edit]

The numbers I know are only half(!) as good as good down.--Scanmap (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CLO Values[edit]

Need a chart with the CLO values of various types of PrimaLoft (Gold, Silver, etc). Grozo (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]