Talk:Professor Chronotis

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled[edit]

Isn't "Reg" just short for "Regius", as in Regius Professor?

Sounds like a Tom Baker/Douglas Adams joke to me! PaulHammond 19:11, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

It wasn't in Shada - must have been in Dirk Gently. --khaosworks 19:14, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Daniel Joyce?[edit]

Have Orman/Blum confirmed that Daniel Joyce in Unnatural History is Professor Chronotis? I thought that Joyce was supposed to be the Doctor's father — the "Ulysses" of the abandoned Leekley script of the TV movie. (Ulysses/Joyce... get it?) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the other connections between The Infinity Doctors and Unatural History, you're probably right. We ought to clarify that.--Sean|Bla ck 05:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chronotis (Shada).png[edit]

Image:Chronotis (Shada).png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]