This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Critics: Property-owning democracy leading principles of state ocialism[edit]
In the introduction to the critics of a property-owning democracy one objection to the system was, that it would lead to an infringement of the economic liberties of acquiring property and creating economic value. Where does the source say that? I thought the position of the source argued on the contrary: the economic liberties are robust, even if they aren't secured on high priority as the basic liberties. I am also not where Alan Thomas feared that, you would need to concede to the principles of state socialism, because the incompatibility with the liberalism he and John Rawls he defends and state socialism comes from freedom of occupation as a basic liberty.
