Talk:Property Law of the People's Republic of China

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original Research[edit]

I've added the template because the last paragraph of this article appears to be OR. Don't know anything about this subject, so if someone else.... but perhaps the offending paragraph should just be deleted. All the same, it's an interesting theory, and it would be nice if a reliable source could be referenced for these claims, if indeed they are plausible. Torgo 03:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The source is the draft text of the law which is linked to the article. Chapter five of the law describes the different types of property. Chapter twelve of the law defines peasant rights to rural land in terms of usufruct. I didn't cite specific articles because the numbering might have changed.

If anyone has a complete English translation, this would be nice to link.

Roadrunner 19:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Math[edit]

Apparently 99.1% figure applies to a government work report, passed with 2862 out of 2889 votes in favor. [1] --Itinerant1 04:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

privitasation[edit]

does this mean china has officially sold out to comunism —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.140.159.0 (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Depends how you define Communism/Marxism/Socialism... Roadrunner 20:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed OR tag[edit]

Put in citations to the law

Roadrunner 20:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed link[edit]

I removed a link to CCLaw.net (and thus their English translation), as 1) the free translation available is incomplete, and 2) there is a complete translation available from the other link to Lehman, Lee & Xu. 202.82.152.13 06:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Property Law of the People's Republic of China/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Reference 6 is broken - whoever put it there should check it again. Loopytune 00:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)