Talk:Pulju moraine

Glaciers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Pulju moraine is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of a typical Pulju moraine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Finland may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Notability[edit]

This stub article doesn't say why a Pulju moraine is different from other types of moraine, other than being in Finland. Please establish WP:NOTABILITY. Compare to the article on Rogen moraine. Reify-tech (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources the publications of Finlands Geological Survey or those in the journal Boreas establish notability per significant coverage. But distinctiviness is another thing. I hope my last addictions makes clear what is distinctive of them. Otherwise I would be good to have access to a comparative study of Fennoscandian moraines, if there is such. Dentren | ^Talk 07:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent additions. I did some modest copyedit cleanups, added some Wikilinks, and discovered that there are still some geological terms that aren't yet covered in Wikipedia, and which should be the subject of future articles.

It still would be nice to get some pictures of a Pulju moraine and/or a Veiki moraine, or at least some topographic maps with the landforms clearly visible. Reify-tech (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your input. I have searched for pictures but could not find any. As the article states the rims of Pulju moraines raises only 1 to 5 meters above the ground surface so I guess it must be difficult to capture the shape in a photograph if the area is forested. Perhaps some landscape pictures taken from the skiing-hill at Kittilä might capture the Pulju moraine landscape... Dentren | ^Talk 10:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]