Talk:Pulse diagnosis

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Cleanup[edit]

It will be a sorry stage , if Wikipidia will remove the contents of the PULSE diagnosis. The article is based on the reality and can be examined at any level. I think, those who like to add more about the subject matter, they should be given chance. After all the contributors motto is to increase the new knowledge in the pages of encyclopeadia. DBB

Stub tag in the middle of the article
Text after stub tag is a message (should perhaps be here on talk page?) not encyclopaeic content

Waggers 13:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major cleanup[edit]

I removed countless words in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS and tidied up grammar. Also removed several sentences that made absolutely no sense at all, some that were repetitive, and some that seemed superfluous. ॐ Priyanath 04:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pulse Diagnosis[edit]

This page is entitled pulse diagnosis. However, it only discusses the Ayurvedic tradition. It leaves out the European, Unani Tibb and Chinese methodologies of pulse diagnosis. I would recommend that each culture have a distinct subset.

I would recommend that scientific, evidence-based medicine be placed apart from practices that lack that evidence. --Wee Jimmy (talk) 14:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up[edit]

I have gone through and started some basic cleanup on the article. If people want to put information back in they need to find sources that meet wp:rs. Tmtoulouse (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging with Nadi pariksha[edit]

Should this article be merged with Nadi pariksha? --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 16:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]