Talk:Pure economic loss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term latter was used after the third example of pure economic loss, but latter can only be applied to a set of two.

This is true - though you can of course edit it yourself... Westmorlandia (talk) 12:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loss of income suffered by a family whose principal earner dies in an accident is generally not considered to be pure economic loss. In most jurisdictions it is considered as consequential economic loss, and is recoverable through an action in personal injury. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.158.16 (talk) 04:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]