Talk:Pyrenean Mountain Dog/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: William Harris (talk · contribs) 06:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello @Cavalryman:, I shall commence the review. Discussion will take place below the following assessment table.
Assessment
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |  Done
|
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Done
|
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Done
|
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Done
|
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | Done
|
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Done
Earwig's Copyvio Detector indicates that there exists a 4% match of content with the content with FCI Breed Standard, and a 2% match with the Société Centrale Canine Breed Standard, as could be expected. Dab Solver indicates "There are no disambiguation links." Checklinks indicates no issues with downloading of references. |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Done Broadly matches Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs#Recommended article structure.
|
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Done
|
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Done
|
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Done
|
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Done
|
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Done
|
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | Meets the requirements of a Good Article. William Harris (talk) 08:55, 22 June 2021 (UTC) |
Discussion[edit]
A well-prepared article that meets the requirements of GA. William Harris (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)