Talk:Qalandia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Arabic script request[edit]

--Bhadani 16:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done, TewfikTalk 01:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates[edit]

Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:

Sorry if I am not reporting this in the correct place. The coordinates on the page for Kalandia are correct 31.863114,35.207583(for the village, not the camp or checkpoint) but in GoogleEarth the marker for the article shows up in the wrong place (a village called Bir Nabala). UmmSalah (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Airport, quarries?[edit]

Seen from heaven, there is something like a huge airport, as well as big quarries (?). Worth some information? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawqala (talk • contribs) 22:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Atarot Airport, and there are also some quarries there indeed. -- 62.0.34.136 (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check point[edit]

The purpose of this check point, similar to many other Israeli check points around Jerusalem, is to prevent Palestinians from entering Jerusalem, rather than allowing ones with permits to enter Jerusalem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.78.49.82 (talk) 09:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refugee camp[edit]

It is baffling that the reference that the Kalandia camp is within Greater is continuously changed to Area "A" in response to an out of context quote from the NYTimes- which is admittedly ambiguous. However what is NOT ambiguous is the description both on the UNRWA site [1] and the official profile .[2] This isn't even a debatable point, kalandia camp is within Greater Jerusalem, and in fact Israeli authorities refused to transfer authority to the Palestinian Authority in 1995 based on the fact it considers the land Greater Jerusalem. The latest edit on the Kalandia camp is even more baffling as it claims kalandia is on the Israeli side of the border yet still in area "A". ALL land on the Israeli side of the barrier is Area "C" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 00:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC) The camp is not abandoned as proven by this article about a fund raiser for children living there- dated just last month (May 2013) It also quotes the population as being 15,000. http://www.gofundme.com/Save-Qalandia-Summer-Camp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 02:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michardav and Mcnary1948: Both of you must study the panel I just inserted at the top of this web page. In particular, both of you have been violating the 1RR restriction that applies to all articles related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many editors have been blocked or otherwise sanctioned for violating this restriction; don't become the next! Zerotalk 07:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The next stage is to discuss the question here. Everyone agrees that the village is within the barrier. The camp is not so simple. Google maps shows it as on the south side of the airport runway and therefore also within the barrier. On the other hand, Btselem's maps show it on the north/northeast side of the runway, outside the barrier. Look at the interactive map here, or the 2012 barrier map below it. This information plus the UNRWA profile suggests the solution to the problem: the barrier cut off some of the refugee camp buildings from the main group. The part inside the barrier is (I assume, but we need a source) mostly abandoned, the part outside is not. Also notice that the barrier does not mark the edge of the municipal boundary of Jerusalem. Look at the boundary (yellow) and the barrier (red) on the Btselem map, they cross each other in a complex fashion. Actually the Btselem map shows the boundary passing through the middle of the camp, which is confusing compared to the UNRWA page. It is not surprising: refugee camps always spread out beyond their official limits. As for the village, it is inside the barrier and outside the municipal boundary. The task now is to find good sources that provide that information. Zerotalk 07:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The UNRWA profile I have sourced is in agreement with the map Zero provided. The Barrier was built on the southwest border of the camp. But that is not what is in question. Two things- is the camp within greater Jerusalem? UNRWA states unequivocally it is. Even the sub-heading on the Kalandia Wiki entry- "Jerusalem Governorate" agree that it is. Second is the camp abadandoned? Too suggest that is ridiculous! On closer inspection, the land on Google Maps appears to be support building for the Jerusalem airport- erroneously labeled "Qalandia Refugee Camp". Both B'Tselem and UNRWA maps show the camp EAST of airport- which is clearly not abandoned- in fact the football field mentioned in the camp profile is clearly visible. Combined with the link I provided for a fundraiser for children in the camp show just last month (May 2013) show the camp is still very much occupied. Regardless, using google maps to show an area abandoned with no corroborating evidence falls under the category of "original research" and as such is unacceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 01:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC) After further research the answer was right on the Kalandia wiki entry itself. If you follow the link under sources "Atarot and the fate of the Jerusalem airport" http://www.jerusalemquarterly.org/ViewArticle.aspx?id=20 "As things stand at the moment, The Wall carves out the Atarot industrial zone – and most of its access roads – as part of Israeli Jerusalem, and keeps Qalandia refugee camp and the areas around it – even parts of Jerusalem such as Qafr Aqab and Semiramis – within the Palestinian (West Bank) side. ". In other words, Google Maps has erroneously labeled the Atarot Industrial Zone as the Qalandia Refugee Camp. Also immediately following the Atarot description we come to this statement "Just after the start of the second Intifada, the industrial zone nearly turned into a ghost town. Israelis felt it was too dangerous to come to the 425-acre complex." So we now know why the area looks deserted. But it is definitely NOT the refugee camp. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 01:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps shows the refugee camp in the wrong place. It is a clear error and so we should ignore it. As for whether the camp is within the municipal boundaries, UNRWA states that it is, and Btselem's map says that the boundary passes through the camp. As I noted above, these are not necessarily contradictory since the area occupied by the camp might be larger than the official extent of the camp. However, without a source addressing this point precisely, we can mention both the UNRWA statement and the Btselem map. Zerotalk 02:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmmm, look at this UNRWA page. We see, with the same date, "Shu'fat is the only West Bank camp that lies within the municipal boundaries of Jerusalem." and "The Israeli authorities consider [Kalandia camp] as part of Greater Jerusalem". I'm getting the feeling that "Greater Jerusalem" does not mean Jerusalem within its municipal boundaries. Indeed Israel does make this distinction. Zerotalk 03:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, just like many great cities have first their municipal boundaries then the "greater" portion that incorporates surrounding areas. That's why I worded my entry as such "Israeli authorities consider it part of Greater Jerusalem and it remains under their control." Frankly the boundary is a non-issue. Is the camp deserted?- no we've established that. Does Israel administer the camp? UNRWA states it does, and so far there's been no refutation on that issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michardav (talk • contribs) 03:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.unrwa.org/etemplate.php?id=119
  2. ^ http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/opt_campprof_unrwa_qalandia_oct_2008.pdf

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalandia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalandia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kalandia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 May 2020[edit]

"Until 1930, Kalandia was the only airport in Mandatory Palestine" -- Samakh was in passenger use from 1929 [1] 84.22.38.22 (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this does not make sense. If Samakh was in use from 1929 (as the source says), then how can you state "Until 1930, Kalandia was the only airport in Mandatory Palestine"? Should that perhaps be "Until 1929, Kalandia was the only airport in Mandatory Palestine"? Huldra (talk) 23:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
1930 is currently in the article, I think the point is to change and or remove it. nableezy - 23:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I switched it to 1929, but that doesnt have a source anyway so maybe the line should just be tossed. nableezy - 23:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick edit, but in fact, I have now found a reference that RAF Gaza was in passenger use since 1927 [2] --84.22.38.22 (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, will change. Any chance you have a source that directly talks about this airport instead of relying on inference based on other airports? nableezy - 23:43, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. In the 1920s, it was just one of the many RAF stations scattered around Palestine: the only special thing about it was its location near the capital. I think that the unsourced statement is obscure anyway: how is an airport without regular flights different from any other RAF airfield? --84.22.38.22 (talk) 09:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, got it, Huldra (talk) 23:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

I have been bold and moved this to its modern name with a Q, consistent with ngram usage and the normal transliteration of its first letter (ق) Qāf. Onceinawhile (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Qalandia&oldid=1201198245"