Talk:Qee
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled[edit]
Dear Terraxos, who added the "Primary Sources" template: This article or section does not need sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications. Consider the word meaning of the word need. This article doesn't truly need anything, and that's all right; not every article has go through nine thousand drafts before it accomplishes what a good article should. This one is good as it is. Perhaps then, the thing to do is to leave it alone, instead of sticking a template on it, and going on your way. This article contains facts, and only facts, regarding Qees. There's no genuine need for third-party verification. And, while "primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of this article are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article," that just doesn't apply in this instance. There's no genuine need to include more appropriate citations from reliable sources. The "Primary Sources" template suggests the alternative of discussing the issue on the Talk Page, but I can't imagine what else there would be to say. Let's leave good articles alone. Please.
Dear Erc, who didn't bother to read the Talk Page, but instead just cited "policy" in the edit summary: Make an argument, or a counter-argument, don't just cite policy amove on. Citing policy isn't the same as making a statement; it's symptomatic of committee-think. And everyone knows that committee-think is the one of Wikipedia's potentially fatal flaws. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.171.140 (talk) 06:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060101093646/http://www.toy2r.com:80/ to http://www.toy2r.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)