Talk:Queen's Harvest

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Clarification question[edit]

I probably should have posted my concern on the talk page initially, but I was confused by the quote: "clear and detailed discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics and motives includes the potential for sowing discord among defenders". Particularly, I was confused about the phrase "discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics". It seems to say organizing the defenders tactics includes sowing discord, which doesn't make sense. How does one organize discord? I thought it was a typo or misquote. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 04:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy/paste straight from the PDF to make sure I have it right - "The clear and detailed discussion and organization of the defenders' tactics and motives includes the potential for sowing discord among defenders." The "discussion [...] of the defenders' tactics and motives" seems pretty clear and straightforward. So changing the word to "organization" makes it less clear, and requires some interpretation. Does he mean, how the tactics are organized, or how the defenders are organized, or how well the information is presented... I am not sure, but I think the latter is probably right since it fits in better with "discussion of", but YMMV. 24.12.74.21 (talk) 08:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that finally just clicked for me. It's a really convoluted sentence. I think I may try rewriting/paraphrasing it to make it more comprehensible. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 21:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]