Talk:Queen + Paul Rodgers
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Under Pressure[edit]
I think the part about Queen performing Under Pressure is unnessesary and might come across as slightly confusing. I think someone needs to go through and try to edit it a little better. any views? (Revo 15:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC))
Huh ?[edit]
What does this mean: "Queen + Paul Rodgers concert was the first outdoor concert since 1991 at wembley stadium, and was planned to be one of the stages for Live 8 but only was sent a message before '39." ?
"Hyde Park in the UK (Att:80.000)" seems not to gel with "The concert was attended by some 65,000 people". -- Beardo 03:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
It's a good point, I was there and can't recall an official attendance being read out -- 86.13.155.120 10:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
few words from Bri`s soapbox... about wikipedia.
- Wed 12 Sep 07**
ALL THUMBS DOWN!
It's a shame that there are stupid people in the world, isn't it?! There are so many good folks, with good intentions, who are prepared to work towards something worthwhile in the world ... And Wikipedia is so fabulously useful; yet a few idiots can spoil anything. You're right - this entry is complete and utter rubbish, in every way. Rubbish, and not even amusing rubbish. Just Garbage - a waste of everyone's time.
You can quote me!!!
Let's hope that by the time you get this, someone sensible has put it where it belongs
Cheers and thanks Bri
I can only agree with the musicant213.130.22.120 07:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Merge[edit]
I suggest that this article should be merged with Queen MrJanitor1 23:05 17 September 2007 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I don't agree at all. "Q+PR" should not be merged with "Queen". As Rodgers is NOT a member of "Queen" May/Rodgers/Taylor use the name "Queen PLUS Paul Rodgers". --Candyfloss 23:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Q+Pr logo.jpg[edit]
Image:Q+Pr logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Late 2008 European Tour[edit]
We don't seem to have much on this. Martin Packer (talk) 12:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Queen + Paul Rodgers = Supergroup[edit]
Just my opinion, but should Queen + Paul Rodgers be classed as a supergroup? Brian May did state in an early 2008 interview that it "feels like a new band", so it qualifies as a group. Brian May and Roger Taylor are two of the greatest musicians, collaborating with Paul Rodgers, one of the biggest stars in Britain and America from the 70's. Surely this should class as a supergroup? The Firm certainly did, and that was with Paul Rodgers and Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin. So surely two members of Queen and Paul Rodgers should qualify? There doesn't even need to be any references, there are no references to Bad Company being a supergroup on their page. Just a consensus maybe? (82.28.237.200 (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC))
Le Zénith[edit]
An arena tour of Europe followed in the spring 2005, with dates at venues such as Wembley Pavilion, Cardiff International Arena and Le Zénith in France. Er, which Le Zénith in France - there are more than a dozen? Emeraude (talk) 14:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Associated acts[edit]
As discussed on Queen's talk page, I propose removing The Cross. I also think Smile should go - Queen, Free and Bad Company seem the most sensible associated acts to retain, given the band members, and also the songs that were played on the tours. Any objections? Tommurphy86 (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Also the website no longer exists Tommurphy86 (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)