Talk:Quién Dijo Ayer

Quién Dijo Ayer has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Quién Dijo Ayer is the main article in the Quién Dijo Ayer series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 28, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 9, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment s[edit]

Just a quick note, if a certification for the US is Latin, you should specify it on the prose. For example, "The album became a hit on Latin America, receiving Gold certifications in Venezuela, Uruguay, Colombia, Chile and Peru; and Platinum certifications in Argentina, Mexico and the United States." to "The album became a hit on Latin America, receiving Gold certifications in Venezuela, Uruguay, Colombia, Chile and Peru; and Platinum certifications in Argentina, Mexico and the United States (Latin field)" or wherever it is appropriate. This helps reader understand that it is not the standard RIAA certification. Erick (talk) 23:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. You're right. Thanks. --Hahc21 (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Quién Dijo Ayer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 21:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

Lede: under Sony Music Entertainment → under the Sony Music Entertainment label

Done.

Lede: No need for ref. in the lead, as it should already be below

Fixed.

Composition: was an artist who proclaims the same values he proclaimed." [9]. Should be a space for the ref.

You mean it shouldn't? Fixed.

Reception: Seems a little small

Nothing more could be found.

Tracklisting → Track listing

Done.

Personnel: After the last names of the people it should be a dash per WP:DASH

Done.

References should be listed before the "External links"

Done.

References: Use the cite web, news, etc. templates

Mmm not necessary. The written references are also permitted.

References: Various overlinking

Mmm the only overlinking I see are the generated by the {{Certification Table Entry}} and {{albumchart}} templates, which, obviously, cannot be modified.

External links: Ricardo Arjona Official Website → Official website

If i write "Official Website", we could be speaking about many official websites. It is needed to state that it is, indeed, his official website.

That's all. Good work. TBran dl ey 21:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Everything have been addressed. Thanks. —Hahc 21 21:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the wait. Completely forgot. I'll pass now. Great work! TBran dl ey 05:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! No problem. Cheers! —Hahc 21 06:13, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quién Dijo Ayer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]