Talk:RER B

	Trains Portal
DYK	2007-11-14

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

This article lacks references.

France: Paris Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:RER B.

Why is there no B1?? Georgia guy 17:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B1 was the designation of the branch terminating (from the south) at Chatelet-Les Halles (from 1977) or Gare du Nord (from 1981). Though the northern branches were nominally part of line B, there was no through working before 1983 due to difference in electrical system. When the two halves of the line became fully integrated, the B1 designation became defunct. (Have put some of this into the article). Vilĉjo 18:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:RER B.gif Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:RER B.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 19 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:RER B.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MI84 and MI79[edit]

There needs to be wiki pages for those trains RedProofHill123 (talk) 20:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They exist! There are wiki pages for those trains now. Links have been added to the Rolling Stock section. Samuelitooooo (talk) 07:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on RER B. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://membres.lycos.fr/mobidf/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051208073801/http://www.metro-pole.net/ to http://www.metro-pole.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]