Talk:RJR Nabisco/Archives/2016
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
RJR NABISCO, INC. v. EUROPEAN COMMUNITY
Why is this not mentioned in the article? Link to the supreme court decision: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/15-138 The fact that this company was before the supreme court of the united states on RICO charges including laundering drug money and material support for foreign terrorist organisations. As far as controversy goes this seems like it qualifies. There is a brief mention of some of the suits in R._J._Reynolds_Tobacco_Company but not of the recent supreme court decision. RJR Nabisco is the named defendant in the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:8C:2E18:CC00:4DD6:7EDC:3CB5:3D4 (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)