This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Recent changes read like a company press release. This article needs to be reworked so that it reads less like an advertisment and more like an encyclopedia. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. It was so much a glorification, consisting largely of WP:PEACOCK language and subjective expression and almost completely unsourced, that neutralizing it while preserving factual and verifiable information seemed more of a burden than anyone was likely to undertake. It seemed necessary to blow it up and revert to the pre-spam version. Largoplazo (talk) 10:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Surely the Seaboard Rise is distinctive, notable and innovative enough to be worthy of its own article? Stub Mandrel (talk) 11:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
