Talk:Radhika Parameswaran

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

Molly's Critiques:

1. First, you shouldn’t need the reference section since all the references are listed at the end. Also, I noticed that you added awards into the “other contributions” section, and I would recommend making awards its own category. Other than that all of the parts were there and the sections all seemed strong. 2. I think the hook could be a stronger, but I also think it does a good job of saying exactly who the person is and what the rest of the article will be about. 3. I didn’t find any spelling errors, and I think all the sentences were clear and the style was good. However, if you add headings, it will automatically save your article in wiki format. 4. Overall I thought the article was really strong and hit on all the main points needed in the article.

Leah's Critique: For your wiki paper, I would recommend labeling your sections based off of the outline that Ann gave us. I would also move the information that you put in the intro to the scholarly work section.

I noticed in your references that you have three sources that you used in your wiki page cited, but you used 6 sources all together throughout your writing. I would make sure to cite those other three sources.

I’m confused with your section labeled “selected publication”, because I’m not sure if that’s your bibliography or just further readings. The bibliography are the 10 or more sources and publications that establish your scholars notoriety. The further reading section is for other publications that your scholar has done that are the most popular and that typically relate to her areas of study. I would make sure to clearly separate these to heading, and possibly add some more sources.

All together though it’s really good! Especially your background, scholarly work, and other contribution sections. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahrempfert (talk • contribs) 20:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestions, folks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aburnett412 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kmor810.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]