Talk:Radical mastectomy

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Radical mastectomy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jsong009, Vchan10. Peer reviewers: Bkim11, Aditya P, Csong22, Jdesai3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cnpacyna.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bbadiey. Peer reviewers: Kmm257, Azg717.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Effects[edit]

As gruesome to contemplate and as psychologically damaging as this operation may be, it was intended to remove all traces of cancer so as to prevent a recurrence. If the lymph nodes were removed, and there was no cancer, then the surgeon was cautiously optimistic that he had gotten it all. On the other hand, if they did this, and the cancer was discovered to have spread to the lymph nodes, that was not a good sign. One of the principal objections to lumpectomy or anything less than radical mastectomy was that a woman who selected those lesser procedures was thought to be more concerned about appearance than saving herself from cancer. I am not saying that is correct, but that is a summary of the then-prevailing medical view.John Paul Parks (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference?[edit]

"From about 1895 to the mid-1970s about 90% of the women being treated for breast cancer in the US underwent the radical mastectomy." Can we have a reference to this statement, please?Norman21 (talk) 17:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fischer's Contribution[edit]

I think it would make sense to add more at the end of the Radical Mastectomy section on how Fischer helped the procedure go out of practice. I think this is an important change in how radical mastectomies were treated, and one sentence does not covey that properly. Furthermore, there would be more learned about the procedure by expounding upon the current summary of Fischer's work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbadiey (talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some Sources that could be useful in this, in addition to the other two sources:

^[1]

^[2]

^[3]

References

^ Lerner, Barron H. "How Clinical Trials Saved Women With Breast Cancer From Disfiguring Surgery". The Atlantic.
^ Fisher, Bernard; Jeong, Jong-Hyeon; Anderson, Stewart; Bryant, John; Fisher, Edwin R.; Wolmark, Norman (22 August 2002). "Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation". New England Journal of Medicine. 347 (8): 567–575. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020128.
^ Cavallo, Joe. "Dr. Bernard Fisher's Breast Cancer Research Left a Lasting Legacy of Improved Therapeutic Efficacy and Survival - The ASCO Post". www.ascopost.com.

Durrida et al[edit]

Much of the Radical mastectomy section is a close paraphrase of section 2.1 of Durrida et al. The paper is CC-BY and is referenced by the article, but that it contains almost a direct copy of that section is not properly attributed. --Philosophus ^T 12:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Lerner, Barron H. "How Clinical Trials Saved Women With Breast Cancer From Disfiguring Surgery". The Atlantic.

[2] Fisher, Bernard; Jeong, Jong-Hyeon; Anderson, Stewart; Bryant, John; Fisher, Edwin R.; Wolmark, Norman (22 August 2002). "Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by Irradiation". New England Journal of Medicine. 347 (8): 567–575. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020128.

[3] Cavallo, Joe. "Dr. Bernard Fisher's Breast Cancer Research Left a Lasting Legacy of Improved Therapeutic Efficacy and Survival - The ASCO Post". www.ascopost.com.

[1]

[2]

[3]