Talk:Radio 1 Madonna controversy/GA1
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 18:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Lead[edit]
- Madonna's single, "Living for Love", → remove both commas here
- from commercial radio in the UK → from commercial radio in the United Kingdom
- In response, Madonna fans → In response, the singer's fans (alternation)
- Unlink "ageism" the second time
- The single peaked at 26 on the → Commercially, "Living for Love" peaked at number 26 on the
Background[edit]
- during the promotion of the film, Shanghai Surprise → no comma here
- and 2006 respectively → comma before "respectively"
- Year in release of "4 Minutes" in brackets
- defended the station's decision → state "their decision" here for alternation
- Madonna saying: "I don't think → : to ,
- For the quote following, fix all ... to [...]
- George Ergatoudis stated that the channel's audience → state "its audience" here for alternation
Events[edit]
- I think it’s going to be all right to play it," Mac concluded → you have to end this sentence with a full stop
- A representative for the station explained → One of its representatives explained (alternation)
Reception[edit]
- from Madonna fans → from Madonna's fans
- for the singer soon spreads to the station's → "spreads" to "spread"
- Sun, Madonna called the omission → state "she" here for alternation
- and that ageism was a taboo that is still not being → link "ageism" here to its respective article
BBC rebuttal and aftermath[edit]
- The station listed David Guetta → The station further listed David Guetta
- For the following quote, fix ... to [...]
- He stated "[Radio 1 are] → comma after "stated"
- top-twenty → top 20
- top-forty → fix to top 40 in both cases
Other stuff[edit]
Copy-violation[edit]
- 56.4% is WAY too much! You may want to change something here!
Images[edit]
- Image from lead needs an explanation
- For the image from "Events", unlink the single's name
Links[edit]
References[edit]
- As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article
- 2 dead links! Please fix!!
Outcome[edit]
On hold for 7 days! Good luck, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Cartoon network freak: done again! —IB [ Poke ] 13:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- Gladly passing! Cartoon network freak (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Cartoon network freak: done again! —IB [ Poke ] 13:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.