Talk:Ragini MMS 2

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

March 23 to 29, 2014 (23rd)

Box office[edit]

/* Box office */ --Ali.wali.4550 (talk) 06:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC) I added material about boxoffice collection of this movie.[reply]

Ragini mms 2 has been a major failure of ekta kapoor camp[edit]

While ekta is known as the queen of tv world and films, recently...only two films have defamed her..namely - OUATIMD and Ragini mms 2. And earlier Jism 2 as well.

Audience/mass have ridiculed OUATIMD and Ragini mms 2 to such extent, more than Raone. In no ways, the film has been a success.

This film belongs to 'flop' category, irrespective of box office verdict.

It is advisable to avoid appealing words for this film... the hit status need not to be mentioned in the main section. Otherwise, ekta would lose her goodwill for her upcoming films too..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.99.16.94 (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2014[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Some fraudulant business person is trying to use this page for promoting their own business... So, it is necessary to rectify the fake feel of the page... So, please allow it.

14.99.16.94 (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. - Arjayay (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2014[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

49.14.100.46 (talk) 12:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 14:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]