Talk:Rain Chudori

"Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately."

There is no source that this author is a multidisciplinary artist. Additionally, her infobox includes information that she is also an editor or actress; however, aside from two acting credits, there is no proof or source that she is today an active actress. Information about the author's books themselves (critically-acclaimed, etc.) cannot be verified.

The community Murmur House is defunct and information about the community no longer available online, and no source is available for the claim that her books were exhibited in international book fairs. Information about Rocket Rain's film awards are likely irrelevant, as the awards were for the director and the film and not her role in the film.

Lastly, in the Indonesian Wikipedia page on the film Galih dan Ratna, the role that she plays of Mimi is listed below taxi driver. As an Indonesian who has watched the film, the role that she plays is a minor one and again calls into question the validity of this page's claim that she is either an actress or a multidisciplinary artist.

Tirtoganggi, I have no objection to any of the reasons you have listed above. In fact, I have no objection to the proposed deletion of the page. The problem is the method in which you have been conducting edits. It appears that most edits you have made to this article do not provide an edit summary, which is a required step in the editing process. When an edit summary is not provided, whoever is watching the article, or any subsequent editor, has no way of knowing what the motive for the previous edit, or in this specific case, major deletions, is/are. This means that an editor would have to do an in-depth investigation into each one of your changes in order to try and parse your motivation, as it doesn't always appear clear. Sometimes it's easier to simply undo the edits and encourage the editor to improve their approach. It seems that, as an unverified editor, you are perhaps new and less experienced with the protocols that are encouraged on Wikipedia, and that's fine. For example, you failed to add a signature to the post you made here, the one I'm responding to. On the other hand, your reasoning seems solid, and I suspect your familiarity with the topic is greater than mine, so my encouragement to you would be to refine your methods, as you are a valuable component of this platform. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Revirvlkodlaku Hi, I appreciate your patience with me as I learn my way around. I'm perhaps too enthusiastic about this personal project of mine (adding to information about Indonesian contemporary writers) and wasn't going about it well. In the future, I'll do my best to include a more detailed edit summary each time I leave edits. I'll also do some more research about Wikipedia's other standards so that this happens less in the future. For this specific Wikipedia page, my suggestions and questions remain: whether or not this person is currently worthy of a Wikipedia page considering there is little secondary information aside from articles on Jakarta Post (which is apparently owned/founded by the person's grandparent). Tirtoganggi (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Tirtoganggi, thanks for taking my critiques in stride. I can certainly relate to your personal project of adding information about contemporary Indonesian writers, as I do something similar when it comes to topics related to contemporary Czech/Slovak music. Keep up the good work, there's always a need for more non-English-dominant cultural content on Wikipedia. I'll admit that I don't have much interest in the topic of this particular page (I have edited it and keep a watch on it mainly for grammatical and stylistic accuracy/consistency), so I won't have much input into deciding whether it should remain or be deleted. As I mentioned before though, your reasoning seems solid to me, and there appear to be very few (if any) good, non-primary sources supporting the claims made on the page, so I have no objections to its deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Rain Chudori

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Rain Chudori, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Tautomers_{(T C)} 05:20, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Tautomers Thank you very much! Would it be possible to incubate this article to give time for additional improvements and edits rather than deleting? I believe that might be better than fully deleting the entry. Tirtoganggi (talk) 05:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

@Tirtoganggi: Sure! There's no obligation for you or anyone to put this up for WP:AfD, you can do so if you want to, or simply continue editing the article. Someone else might put it up for AfD, and if they do you can participate in the discussion (I don't intend to put this up for AfD). --Tautomers_{(T C)}