Talk:Rainie Cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRainie Cross has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Inside Soap[edit]

Just letting you know there is a good one interview with Franks in Inside Soap - that's if you didn't know already.Rain the 1 BAM 20:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] MayhemMario 17:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She came first in a poll in this week's inside soap. missing out on more info here guys...RaintheOne BAM 19:49, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dont mean to be rude, but can you give me the info form the poll? Like who was in it, what it was about etc. MayhemMario 20:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. The question was: "Which Walford lady would you like to see Ian hook up with next - Denise, Rainie, Carol or Kim?" - and the results Rainie=42%, Kim=33%, Denise=13% and Carol=12%... Inside Soap issue 30, 30 Jul - 5 Aug, page 97, "Your Verdict" - There you go.RaintheOne BAM 20:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that poll is worthy of inclusion. –anemoneprojectors– 13:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rainie Cross/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cloudbound (talk · contribs) 11:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

  • Good work, however I don't feel I can pass this yet as there are no references in the Storylines section.

Cloudbound (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the nominator but thought i'd draw you'r attention to this which was agreed after this discussion. D4nnyw14 (talk) 14:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes shadowing D4nnyw14 comment, you dont need sources for storylines. MayhemMario 15:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that. In that case this article has passed. Cloudbound (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

"See the queen speech on the EastEnders website"[edit]

This edit summary seems fine but I can't see it on these puters. Can someone explain just so I know? –anemoneprojectors– 15:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen Vic bust talks about the recent departee's of Walford and Rainie is shown along with others. GSorbyPing! 16:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Does that mean the actress left the cast, or just that the character departed Walford? –anemoneprojectors– 16:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
She did the usual disappear at Christmas act. Makes me wonder if Franks was in panto or booked extended leave. If that's the case I predict a return by approximately March. George, I thought you actually had spoken to Franks, and she said she wasnt leaving?GunGagdinMoan 18:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It showed Grace has departed too. Now Im not a TV producer, but even I can figure out that if the character has departed, then at least give her a) a departure storyline b) an on-screen minor comment about her moving? MayhemMario 18:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duration[edit]

I know there are certain rules regarding the duration if the character's appearances are more than a year apart, however I do think we should revise this for the case of Rainie. She did not appear continuously between 2007-2008, or between 2010 and 2011. She was a recurring character with short stints, surely this should be detailed in the duration? Alex250P (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, she was a character who appeared between 2007 and 2011, so we could put 2007-11 and it would still be right. Saying 2007-08 and 2010-11 is also correct. 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 is also correct but looks a bit long. I don't see why Rainie should be an exception to the rule - I can understand some others but not this one. –anemoneprojectors– 18:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]