Talk:Rainie Yang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please help add citations!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Longliveemomusic (talk • contribs) 23:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any sources about who she has been linked to. So we should remove that entire section. That's all conjecture anyways. That does not belong on Wikipedia.


The Trivia Section does not belong in sTANLEY AND cRISTAL.

External Links[edit]

I am adding back the external links section, seeing as decent external links can provide a good source of information to those who want to learn more about the topic covered. Please do not remove them.--Haley 00:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Haley de Lioncourt[reply]

only 40000?[edit]

Actually the wikipedia articles about Nanjing and the Massacre of Nanjing state that the Chinese claim that 300000 non-combatants were murdered by the Japanese. So there's something wrong with this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.37.166.68 (talk) 19:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when the person told her about the massacre, they probably didn't really recall an exact figure off the top of their head. The key point in the paragraph is that Yang seemed surprised at the paucity of casualities, which is what got people angry. You can add a note that the actual number of casualties is closer to 300,000, as you stated, if you provide a reference and whatnot. Pandacomics (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I could not find evidence of Rainie Yang ever talking about Nanjing. If you have respectable sources stating she actually said it please do share. Otherwise we should not attribute the statement to her. Here are three sources stating she did not make the Nanjing statement, all in simplified Chinese.
The first is an interview with sina.com. The second is a forum posting of a comprehensive overview of the incident with video footage. The third cites an article in Apply Daily.
http://ent.sina.com.cn/y/2007-04-03/17191503763.html
http://bbs.ent.qq.com/b-1000003930/1408.htm
http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/37227224.html
Only the first is citable, although the other two provide strong circumstantial evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stone321 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how to add a reference to the text and this is why I won't edit the main text. But here is the picture of the actual Memorial Hall for the victims of the massacre IN Nanjing, IN China (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nj06.jpg). And here is a reference (http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/0820/p1s3-woap.html). I was surprised because a smaller number would actually support the Japanese side of the debate (The Japanese basically claim that there was no massacre), while a larger number supports the Chinese side, so unless Rainie Yang made it look like not enough people died for her tastes, the reactions in mainland China had probably no other reason than the fact that she's Taiwanese, and would have probably occured regardless of what she said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.124.35.173 (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC) And i do not notice ANY source for the claim that she said "only 40000". Some sources (for example http://zonaeuropa.com/20060612_1.htm and http://www.soompi.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t5700-600.html) claim that she didn't know the answer and upon hearing that it was actually 300000 she said something to the effect of "that's a lot" something like "as little as 300000". I really believe that the 40000 number has to disappear from the article. The truth is that whatever the number there WAS a massacre at Nanjing, there WAS an attack at Pearl Harbour etc. And at Nanjing the people that died, even if not 300 000, were certainly more tahn 200 000. Denying genocide is akin to doing it again. As you can see, my perspective isn't really NPOV. So I won't edit the article. But it needs editing as no source says anything about 40000 casualties in this context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.124.35.173 (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainie Yang 2006.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Rainie Yang 2006.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:3016873363 2 5 Z2Avl9Bt.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:3016873363 2 5 Z2Avl9Bt.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rainie Yang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"楊丞琳 Rainie Yang" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 楊丞琳 Rainie Yang. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 7#楊丞琳 Rainie Yang until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 11:39, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rainie_Yang&oldid=1210364021"