Talk:Rajini Rao

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Autism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Laurel Oldach (8 March 2022). "What's with Wikipedia and women?". American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Retrieved 9 March 2022. Rajini Rao found the Wikipedia article about herself by accident. "I was sort of flattered," she said. "It was remarkably detailed. I was like, 'Somebody read my thesis?'" But a few months later, the physiologist found a banner across the top of the page, indicating that a volunteer contributor to the encyclopedia had expressed doubt about her academic notability.

Notability.[edit]

One criterion is about whether The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. In fact, 1.a) talks about if the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work.

Well, you can check on Google Scholar that Rajini Rao has an h-index of 48. This, in the field of Biology.

If you take a look at this study by Anna Samoilenko & Taha Yasseri,The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics, back when it was published only 36% of Biologists (academics) with an article in WP:EN had an h-index over the mean of their field that, at the moment, was 22. So, well, I'm quite sure in 7 it has not doubled, and even so professor Rajini Rao would be over the mean and deserve to hare an article.

So, I hope the «notability thingy» will not be put there again. Thanks.

--77.75.179.1 (talk) 00:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, Rao is more than notable enough to fulfil these notability criteria. To the editor who corrected the tag User:77.75.179.1: thank you! If you make a Wikipedia account it will let you easily track all of your contributions as well as telling other editors you're serious about contributing to the encyclopaedia. Please make one if you can! Jesswade88 (talk) 06:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]