Talk:Ramya Krishnan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Karnataka / Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Untitled[edit]

The article is now in considerably better shape though I would not say it is perfect. I am removing cleanup tag. Further areas I can think of expansion would be an Awards section, roles played by the actress in various films, more about her personal life and also about her acting skills --Vyzasatya 07:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

merging with Ramya Krishna proposed as these are 100% duplicates --Vyzasatya 01:08, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support the merger with the caveat that Ramyakrishna be retained and Ramya Krishna be converted into a re-direct. --Gurubrahma 11:06, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image requested[edit]

Change the image to latest picture Aparna A kumar (talk) 18:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It's unclear what "lastest picture" you are referring to. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

birth date of Ramya krishnan[edit]

Ramya madam is born on 1970 so please don't change this edit Aparna A kumar (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramya krishnan was born on 1970 Look at her official page on facebook and she completed her 32 years of career last year .she started her acting career at age of 13 .so 13+32=46 So as in 2017 calcuation she is 47...please don't its my humble request people are trusting wikipedia because it won't mislead informations .people always trust in Wikipedia that other communities.. Arnav Nadh (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramya krishnan completed her 32 years of film career last year.she started acting at age of 13. Arnav Nadh (talk) 15:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Arnav Nadh: Is there a reason why you've started three discussions about this? The 1970 birthdate is attributed to this source. The data has been vandalised numerous times, which is a shame, but the simple solution is to change it back. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ramya Krishnan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160702102328/http://www.filmfare.com/news/winners-of-the-63rd-britannia-filmfare-awards-south-13996.html to http://www.filmfare.com/news/winners-of-the-63rd-britannia-filmfare-awards-south-13996.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

highlighting the caste[edit]

Please don't add someone's cast or religion on biography Arnav Nadh (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you're talking about this edit? There's nothing inherently wrong with indicating a person's caste or religion, but religion would have to be attributed to reliable published source, and caste in particular would have to be established through self-identification, meaning Ramya herself would have to say that she is a member of ___ caste. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "the late" in describing a dead person[edit]

@70.24.161.248, According to this discussion, the community had decided that it is best to avoid the usage of the word 'late' before the name of a dead person, like you did here, as per MOS:EUPHEMISM, MOS:HONORIFIC and MOS:REALTIME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]