Talk:Ranfurly Shield

Ranfurly Shield
Sport	Rugby union
Type	Provincial challenge trophy
First contested	1904
Current holder	Waikato (since 2012)
Official website	www.itmcup.co.nz

Rugby union High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The shield tally is wrong, Auckland have won the most, with Canterbury second — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.88.233 (talk) 00:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shield Image[edit]

We should not be using an image of such dubious licensing and would be better to have no image until we have a free one. There can not be a fair use claim since the shield is frequently displayed in public so it should be easy to obtain a free photo of it. dramatic (talk) 11:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know anything about wikipedia but would like to point out the ranfurlyshield.com link does not exist for anybody who cares to edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.112.14 (talk) 07:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Does the infobox for this article seem entirely inappropriate? It seems to have been designed for league and cup competitions rather than a challenge shield. There are is no champion (simply a holder), not titles (just past holders, or "reigns"), and it wasn't "founded"!? I'm seriously considering removing it, but it would be better if I could replace it with something more appropriate. What do people think? - Shudde ^talk 12:51, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something simple like this? - Shudde ^talk 13:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]