Talk:Rave Mobile Safety

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that: "won the Jeanne Clery Campus Safety award for their implementation of the Rave Guardian product" is a claim of significance. See also WP:CCSI#All subjects; As for G11, this is largely factual in tone, and can be edited to be fully NPOV.. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits.

Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.

News articles[edit]

Added link to news articles wrt/ skepticism and flaws of mandatory University enrollment in this service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ab5602 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two Hundred Cell Phones?[edit]

"The alternative is to carry two hundred cell phones and the usefulness of this added connectivity is questioned..." isn't this an exaderation? Shouldn't it say "The alternative is to carry two cell phones and the usefulness of this added connectivity is questioned..." Sense the student would only have to caryy two phones, not 200, and written this way it seems better.Prede (talk) 20:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]