Talk:Razz (poker)

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Opening comment[edit]

I've created this page and humbly submit it to you for polishing. I'm sure someone with more Wiki savvy than me can touch this up. I've also left the strategy category blank for now, I am working on a bit for that but feel free to jump in if you like. Wtbe7560 22:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added a basic strategy section for you. 170.140.219.66 19:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A-2-3 IS the best starting hand in Razz, not "normally" and it isn't POV so I reverted that edit. 170.140.219.66 13:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's an inaccurate statement. "Normally" is right. In the case of A23 versus A45, with dead cards of 4,4,4,5,5, the A45 is very much better. 2005 16:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shortage of cards[edit]

Should this section really be included? IIRC this rule is valid for all stud games. PokitJaxx (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There should just be one sentence, with a link pointing to where it is covered in the main stud article. 2005 (talk) 00:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]